Designing Student Lounge at University: Fostering Place Attachment, Socialization, and Restoration

Al ,Ansari, Ahmed Ibrahim

doi:10.21608/maut.2022.245059

Designing Student Lounge at University: Fostering Place Attachment, Socialization, and Restoration"

Author

Ahmed Ibrahim Al ,Ansari

Associate Professor, Department of Interior Design, Faculty of Basic Education General Authority for Applied Education and Training, Kuwait

10.21608/maut.2022.245059

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study is to investigate the student center needs and activities of undergraduate students in the College of Basic Education in Kuwait.
Methodology: A quantitative research approach was implemented in the study by employing a survey questionnaire. An online questionnaire was distributed to undergraduate students through WhatsApp messages. Of the one thousand and twenty-six (N=1,026) undergraduate students who completed the survey questionnaire, ninety percent (90%) were females.
Results: The findings of the study illustrate that the top first Third Place for college students to spend off time is coffee shops. The key findings regarding the expected activities at the student center included: eating and drinking (60%), hanging out with friends (59%), prayer (48%), taking a nap (27%), school assignments (25%), group study (15%), and hosting small parties (6%). The most essential facilities to be the smartphone charging stations (61%), sleeping areas (60%), lockers (46%), couches (42%), study rooms (42%), kitchenettes (41%), dining room (35%), computer labs (35%), and entertainment areas (33%). Based on the findings of this study, twelve interior design students designed student lounges proposals, then they were submitted to the school administration for implementation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Interior design and Furniture.

References

Banning, J.H., Clemons, S., McKelfresh, D. and Waxman, L.K. (2006). Designing the third place: a concept for campus auxiliaries. College Services, 6(3), 46-50.

Herman Miller (2009). Adaptable spaces and their impact on learning research summary. Herman Miller Research Summary, p. 1-9.

Tural, E., Read, M., & amp; Lee, S. (2016). Design for collaborative learning: The shifting ground of campus building design. Proceedings of the Interior Design Educators Council Conference. Chicago, IL: Interior Design Educators Council.

Waxman, L. Clemons, S. Banning, J. & McKelfresh, D. (2007). The library as a place: Providing opportunities for socialization, relaxation, and restoration. New LibraryWorld,108 (9/10), 424-434.

Waxman, L.K. (2006). The coffee shop: social and physical factors influencing place attachment. Journal of Interior Design,31(3), 35-53.

Seamon, D. (2014). Place attachment and phenomenology: The synergistic dynamism of place. In Manzo, L. C. & P. Devine-Wright (eds.), Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods, and applications (pp. 11-22). London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.

Keup, J. R., & Stolzenberg, E. B. (2004). The 2003 your first college year (YFCY) survey: Exploring the academic and personal experiences of first-year students (Monograph No. 40). Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

Lawsen, K. (2004). Libraries in the USA as traditional and virtual ‘third places. New Library World,105(1198/1999), 125-30.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M.F. & Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and managing student loyalty: an approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331-44.

Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of Attachment and Place Attachment. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee, and M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 137-170). Aldershot: Ashgate.