Act of Designing interpreting Unification Methodology In view of Daoism Philosophy

Authors

1 Emeritus Professor, Department of Industrial Design Faculty of Applied Arts - Helwan University

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Design Faculty of Applied Arts - Damietta University

3 Assistant Lecturer, Department of Industrial Design Faculty of Applied Arts - Damietta University

Abstract

Unification Methodology falls under the umbrella of Complexity Theory, which prevails the philosophical theories of the 3rd. millennium; Unification needs a lot of philosophical research to clarify it and learn about its different aspects.
Act of Designing as a complex and practical human activity, it represents one of the designer human activities in one hand can contribute to the interpretation of the Unification Methodology on the other hand, where it can be considered a form of scientific theorem of Unification philosophical theory, where each philosophical theory needs a scientific theorem or more to help in its interpretation and utilization on the physical level.
Act of design can work as an applied scientific theory of Unification Methodology. In this area, the concepts of Daoism Philosophy and its practical model of Yang-Yin can be borrowed in dealing with the Act of Designing Strategy to present a coherent scientific & practical image to interpret the philosophical theory of Unification.
Act of design is divided into two complementary types of human creative & innovative activities, one relates to the creative intellectual Cognitive Activities of the designer, while the other relates to the Skillful Activities of the designer to utilize his practical physical performance for gestalt his ideas and design concepts into physical touchable reality, both types of activities are complementary and unified in Reiterative Strategy of thinking and gestaltist (a configuration or pattern of elements so unified as a whole that it cannot be described merely as a sum of its parts) artifact
 
 
 
 
.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. أولا: مراجع عربية

    1. الديوب، سمر(2017م): جدل الثنائيات الضدية في الفکر والأدب، مجلة العروبة، القاهرة، العدد 14856.
    2. على، الشيماء صالح (2017م): تطويع هندسة کانساي Kansei Engineering ودمجها في مجال التصميم الصناعي، رسالة دکتوراه غير منشورة، تخصص التصميم الصناعي، کلية الفنون التطبيقية، جامعة حلوان، ص  129-133.
    3. المقدسي، صبري (2013م): الطاوية: المنشأ والجذور والعقائد الروحية، مجلة الحوار المتمدن، محور دراسات وأبحاث في التاريخ والتراث واللغات، العراق، العدد 4095.
    4. کولر، جولن/ ترجمة، کامل يوسف حسين (1995م): الفکر الشرقي القديم، کتاب مترجم، عالم المعرفة، العدد 199، ص 379.
    5. جبار، زيدون خلف (2019م): بعض الإزواجات تدعم بناء شکل المنتج، رسالة دکتوراة منشورة، تخصص التصميم الصناعي، کلية الفنون التطبيقية، جامعة حلون، ص 8-14.
    6. سعد، محمد عزت (2021م)، فعل التصميم Act of designing، محاضرة مسجلة، قسم التصميم الصناعي، کلية الفنون التطبيقية، جامعة حلوان.

    ثانيا: مراجع أجنبية

    1. Gentes, Annie (2017), The In-Discipline of Design, Design Research Foundations, ebook, Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-65984-8.
    2. Fuller, Jarrett (2020) , Every Act of Design is an Act of Future-making, Graphic Design Article, Eye on Design.
    3. Shan , Jun (2020), The Meaning of Yin and Yang, Meaning, Origins, and Uses of Yin and Yang in Chinese Culture, Humanities (History & Culture), Article, ThoughtCo.,

    ثالثا: مواقع الشبکة الدولية العنکبوتية

    1.  https://www.pacific-research.com/what-is-the-industrial-design-process-prl
    2.  https://personaltao.com/taoism/what-is-yin-yang//
    3. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Laozi/images-videos

     

     

     

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics